Press "Enter" to skip to content

BCCI strikes to SC for full 3-year time period for president Ganguly, secretary Shah

The Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) has filed a case earlier than the Supreme Court, in search of a change within the board’s structure. The change in BCCI’s structure would enable the president and secretary to finish their full three-year phrases with out serving the mandatory cooling interval as required by the Justice Lodha commitee.


According to a information report by the Times of India, the applying was filed by treasurer Arun Dhumal. In the applying, Dhumal acknowledged that these modifications had been accepted on the AGM on December 1 and was in search of go away of the SC, as per its August 9, 2018 order, to implement them by altering the structure.


What BCCI’s structure say about three-year cooling off interval?

According to the present guidelines of structure, accepted by SC, a three-year cooling off interval is obligatory for anybody who had served two phrases in state cricket associations or at This means, Ganguly and Shah should keep away from the board and its actions beginning July and June respectively.


Before the appointment as BCCI president, Ganguly was head of Cricket Association of Bengal (CAB) whereas Shah was at helm of Gujarat Cricket Association.



Other proposal mentioned in BCCI’s AGM on December 1, 2019

During the AGM, the members additionally mentioned to scrap Committee of Administrators (CoA) ready structure that disqualified and individual charged with a legal offence from a BCCI member.


The board mentioned these modifications had been essential for the sleek administration of cricket and to successfully utilise the executive expertise accessible within the three-tier district-state-national cricket administration.




“The draft (structure) was ready by individuals who didn’t have ground-level expertise of functioning of this three-tier construction wherein the transition of cricket directors is stage-wise, which is within the bigger curiosity of the sport of cricket. Any provision which has a direct or an oblique impact of limiting individuals with wealthy and various expertise, whereby they’ve acquired and strengthened organising capability, finance producing capability and administrative abilities shall be to the detriment of the sport of cricket,” the BCCI mentioned.



Source hyperlink

Be First to Comment

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *